Thirty years of Mila
Mila in numbers
Mila has risen from 5 girls in 1996 to 1,014 in 2025, though it is below its peak of 1,133 in 2021. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2010 and 2013, from 62 to 456. It ranked 2,683rd in 1996, reached 35th in 2023 and ranks 40th now. On average it was given to 5 girls a year in the late 1990s, 35 in the 2000s, 578 in the 2010s and 1,040 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+6%953 to 1,014
- 5 years+4%973 to 1,014
- 10 years+47%692 to 1,014
- 20 years+3,397%29 to 1,014
- Since 1996×2035 to 1,014
- Total, 1996 to 202512,387girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 40 · ONS · 953 in 2024
Rank 40 · NRS · 105 in 2024
Rank 132 · NISRA · 13 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | =40 | 1,014 | +6% | 1 in 281 |
| 2024 | 46 | 953 | -15% | 1 in 304 |
| 2023 | 35 | 1,127 | +8% | 1 in 256 |
| 2022 | 45 | 1,042 | -8% | 1 in 283 |
| 2021 | 39 | 1,133 | +16% | 1 in 269 |
| 2020 | 47 | 973 | -4% | 1 in 308 |
| 2019 | 50 | 1,017 | -3% | 1 in 306 |
| 2018 | 49 | 1,050 | +36% | 1 in 304 |
| 2017 | 74 | 774 | +14% | 1 in 428 |
| 2016 | 81 | 679 | -2% | 1 in 500 |
| 2015 | 79 | 692 | +30% | 1 in 491 |
| 2014 | 106 | 533 | +17% | 1 in 635 |
| 2013 * | 124 | 456 | +40% | 1 in 749 |
| 2012 | 160 | 326 | +75% | 1 in 1,090 |
| 2011 | =261 | 186 | +200% | 1 in 1,897 |
| 2010 | =616 | 62 | -13% | 1 in 5,681 |
| 2009 | =547 | 71 | +42% | 1 in 4,846 |
| 2008 | =710 | 50 | +0% | 1 in 6,915 |
| 2007 | =683 | 50 | +2% | 1 in 6,710 |
| 2006 | =649 | 49 | +69% | 1 in 6,677 |
| 2005 | =931 | 29 | +32% | 1 in 10,870 |
| 2004 | =1,072 | 22 | -33% | 1 in 14,153 |
| 2003 | =799 | 33 | +154% | 1 in 9,183 |
| 2002 | =1,442 | 13 | -28% | 1 in 22,311 |
| 2001 | =1,107 | 18 | +29% | 1 in 16,110 |
| 2000 | =1,313 | 14 | +100% | 1 in 21,058 |
| 1999 | =2,189 | 7 | +40% | 1 in 43,230 |
| 1998 | =2,701 | 5 | +25% | n/a |
| 1997 | =3,174 | 4 | -20% | 1 in 78,378 |
| 1996 | =2,683 | 5 | 1 in 63,197 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Mila
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Mila is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate
Mila is in our lists: Short baby names.