Thirty years of Emily
Emily in numbers
Emily peaked in 1999 with 6,760 girls and has fallen since, to 956 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 1999 and 2002, from 6,760 to 5,390. It ranked 4th in 1996, reached 1st in 2003 and ranks 44th now. On average it was given to 6,585 girls a year in the late 1990s, 5,166 in the 2000s, 3,586 in the 2010s and 1,451 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-18%1,170 to 956
- 5 years-50%1,896 to 956
- 10 years-75%3,893 to 956
- 20 years-80%4,752 to 956
- Since 1996-85%6,415 to 956
- Total, 1996 to 2025122,568girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 44 · ONS · 1,170 in 2024
Rank 6 · NRS · 198 in 2024
Rank 6 · NISRA · 96 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 44 | 956 | -18% | 1 in 298 |
| 2024 | 34 | 1,170 | -9% | 1 in 248 |
| 2023 | 28 | 1,280 | -20% | 1 in 225 |
| 2022 | 19 | 1,609 | -10% | 1 in 183 |
| 2021 | 19 | 1,797 | -5% | 1 in 170 |
| 2020 | 15 | 1,896 | -16% | 1 in 158 |
| 2019 | 11 | 2,262 | -15% | 1 in 138 |
| 2018 | 5 | 2,676 | -14% | 1 in 119 |
| 2017 | 5 | 3,121 | -12% | 1 in 106 |
| 2016 | 3 | 3,551 | -9% | 1 in 96 |
| 2015 | 3 | 3,893 | -2% | 1 in 87 |
| 2014 | 4 | 3,991 | -1% | 1 in 85 |
| 2013 * | 3 | 4,049 | +0% | 1 in 84 |
| 2012 | 4 | 4,029 | +1% | 1 in 88 |
| 2011 | 5 | 3,974 | -8% | 1 in 89 |
| 2010 | 3 | 4,310 | -3% | 1 in 82 |
| 2009 | 4 | 4,462 | -9% | 1 in 77 |
| 2008 | 3 | 4,881 | +3% | 1 in 71 |
| 2007 | 4 | 4,732 | +6% | 1 in 71 |
| 2006 | 5 | 4,474 | -6% | 1 in 73 |
| 2005 | 2 | 4,752 | -12% | 1 in 66 |
| 2004 | 1 | 5,399 | -0% | 1 in 58 |
| 2003 | 1 | 5,423 | +1% | 1 in 56 |
| 2002 | 2 | 5,390 | -9% | 1 in 54 |
| 2001 | 2 | 5,918 | -5% | 1 in 49 |
| 2000 | 2 | 6,232 | -8% | 1 in 47 |
| 1999 | 2 | 6,760 | +3% | 1 in 45 |
| 1998 | 2 | 6,550 | -1% | n/a |
| 1997 | 2 | 6,616 | +3% | 1 in 47 |
| 1996 | 4 | 6,415 | 1 in 49 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Emily
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Emily is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate