Names / Girls / England and Wales

Ruby

Ruby was given to 1,032 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 38th, down from 1st at its height in 2007.

1,032babies in 2025
#38rank, up 3 on 2024
1 in 276†girls born in 2025
-24%†since 2020 (1,359)

Thirty years of Ruby

RubyEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Ruby in numbers

Ruby peaked in 2007 with 4,983 girls and has fallen since, to 1,032 in 2025. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2003 and 2006, from 1,084 to 4,511. It ranked 103rd in 1996, reached 1st in 2007 and ranks 38th now. On average it was given to 500 girls a year in the late 1990s, 2,708 in the 2000s, 2,543 in the 2010s and 1,174 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

What the official statisticians said

  • “In Wales, Ruby was the firm favourite for baby girls, perhaps due to the link with the colour red or celebrity Charlotte Church’s daughter?”

    ONS, on 2010 births in England and Wales. Read the source

  • “Other 'Enders names to have a good year were Ruby (Up 16 places to 15)”

    General Register Office, on 2005 births in England and Wales. Read the source

Quoted word for word from the official releases, including their own “may” and “could”. Baby Data has not added reasons of its own. Releases for Scotland and Northern Ireland are about babies there, not in England and Wales.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 500 from 1996
1999First in the top 100
2003First in the top 50
2006First in the top 10
2007Its peak: 4,983 babies

Change

  • On last year+1%1,020 to 1,032
  • 5 years-24%1,359 to 1,032
  • 10 years-53%2,215 to 1,032
  • 20 years-67%3,149 to 1,032
  • Since 1996×2458 to 1,032
  • Total, 1996 to 202561,553girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Summer, Laila, Maddison, Isabelle, Tilly. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales1,032

Rank 38 · ONS · 1,020 in 2024

Scotland115

Rank 30 · NRS · 100 in 2024

Northern Ireland55

Rank 23 · NISRA · 45 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Ruby year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025381,032+1%1 in 276
2024411,020-4%1 in 284
2023391,059-17%1 in 272
2022301,271-2%1 in 232
2021341,300-4%1 in 234
2020301,359-18%1 in 220
2019271,656+8%1 in 188
2018321,531-9%1 in 209
2017291,688-11%1 in 196
2016261,904-14%1 in 178
2015172,215-15%1 in 153
2014152,595-12%1 in 130
2013 *112,948-9%1 in 116
2012123,231-13%1 in 110
201173,702-7%1 in 95
201073,961-13%1 in 89
200924,555-8%1 in 76
200824,931-1%1 in 70
200714,983+10%1 in 67
200644,511+43%1 in 73
2005123,149+90%1 in 100
2004311,654+53%1 in 188
2003471,084+36%1 in 280
200266795+7%1 in 365
200167745+10%1 in 389
2000=78675+16%1 in 437
199993581+22%1 in 521
1998107475-2%n/a
1997104485+6%1 in 646
19961034581 in 690

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Ruby

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Ruby with any name

Share and download

Ruby is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

Ruby is in our lists: Short baby names.

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026