Thirty years of Aurora
Aurora in numbers
Aurora is still climbing: from 16 girls in 1996 to 1,030 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2014 and 2017, from 268 to 665. It ranked 1,168th in 1996 and reached 39th in 2025, its best place so far. On average it was given to 18 girls a year in the late 1990s, 39 in the 2000s, 394 in the 2010s and 943 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+3%1,002 to 1,030
- 5 years+32%781 to 1,030
- 10 years+147%417 to 1,030
- 20 years+2,684%37 to 1,030
- Since 1996×6416 to 1,030
- Total, 1996 to 202510,064girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 39 · ONS · 1,002 in 2024
Rank 45 · NRS · 74 in 2024
Rank 87 · NISRA · 22 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 39 | 1,030 | +3% | 1 in 276 |
| 2024 | 43 | 1,002 | +4% | 1 in 289 |
| 2023 | 49 | 964 | -1% | 1 in 299 |
| 2022 | 49 | 972 | +7% | 1 in 303 |
| 2021 | 56 | 910 | +17% | 1 in 335 |
| 2020 | 64 | 781 | +1% | 1 in 383 |
| 2019 | 70 | 777 | +3% | 1 in 401 |
| 2018 | 69 | 752 | +13% | 1 in 425 |
| 2017 | 80 | 665 | +20% | 1 in 498 |
| 2016 | 105 | 552 | +32% | 1 in 615 |
| 2015 | =136 | 417 | +56% | 1 in 815 |
| 2014 | =200 | 268 | +43% | 1 in 1,263 |
| 2013 * | =257 | 187 | +34% | 1 in 1,826 |
| 2012 | =345 | 140 | +26% | 1 in 2,538 |
| 2011 | =404 | 111 | +52% | 1 in 3,180 |
| 2010 | =549 | 73 | -6% | 1 in 4,825 |
| 2009 | =514 | 78 | +34% | 1 in 4,412 |
| 2008 | =639 | 58 | +7% | 1 in 5,961 |
| 2007 | =645 | 54 | +42% | 1 in 6,213 |
| 2006 | =796 | 38 | +3% | 1 in 8,610 |
| 2005 | =769 | 37 | +61% | 1 in 8,519 |
| 2004 | =1,043 | 23 | -34% | 1 in 13,538 |
| 2003 | =771 | 35 | +52% | 1 in 8,658 |
| 2002 | =962 | 23 | +0% | 1 in 12,611 |
| 2001 | =936 | 23 | +5% | 1 in 12,608 |
| 2000 | =969 | 22 | -4% | 1 in 13,400 |
| 1999 | =928 | 23 | +35% | 1 in 13,157 |
| 1998 | =1,165 | 17 | +6% | n/a |
| 1997 | =1,176 | 16 | +0% | 1 in 19,595 |
| 1996 | =1,168 | 16 | 1 in 19,749 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Aurora
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Aurora is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate
Aurora is in our lists: Nature baby names, Mythological baby names.