Thirty years of Lilly
Lilly in numbers
Lilly peaked in 2011 with 1,950 girls and has fallen since, to 382 in 2025. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2008 and 2011, from 1,268 to 1,950. It ranked 375th in 1996, reached 27th in 2011 and ranks 129th now. On average it was given to 97 girls a year in the late 1990s, 662 in the 2000s, 1,219 in the 2010s and 475 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+2%375 to 382
- 5 years-32%565 to 382
- 10 years-67%1,146 to 382
- 20 years-46%703 to 382
- Since 1996×489 to 382
- Total, 1996 to 202522,050girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 129 · ONS · 375 in 2024
Rank 83 · NRS · 32 in 2024
Rank 177 · NISRA · 7 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 129 | 382 | +2% | 1 in 745 |
| 2024 | =130 | 375 | -15% | 1 in 773 |
| 2023 | 110 | 439 | -18% | 1 in 656 |
| 2022 | 92 | 538 | -2% | 1 in 548 |
| 2021 | 96 | 551 | -2% | 1 in 553 |
| 2020 | 91 | 565 | -10% | 1 in 530 |
| 2019 | 86 | 625 | -20% | 1 in 498 |
| 2018 | 67 | 785 | -11% | 1 in 407 |
| 2017 | 64 | 884 | -13% | 1 in 374 |
| 2016 | 60 | 1,014 | -12% | 1 in 335 |
| 2015 | 50 | 1,146 | -15% | 1 in 296 |
| 2014 | 40 | 1,352 | -2% | 1 in 250 |
| 2013 * | 37 | 1,386 | -10% | 1 in 246 |
| 2012 | 33 | 1,536 | -21% | 1 in 231 |
| 2011 | 27 | 1,950 | +29% | 1 in 181 |
| 2010 | 39 | 1,512 | +13% | 1 in 233 |
| 2009 | 45 | 1,343 | +6% | 1 in 256 |
| 2008 | 48 | 1,268 | +8% | 1 in 273 |
| 2007 | 54 | 1,171 | +39% | 1 in 287 |
| 2006 | 71 | 842 | +20% | 1 in 389 |
| 2005 | 74 | 703 | +35% | 1 in 448 |
| 2004 | 100 | 521 | +79% | 1 in 598 |
| 2003 | =169 | 291 | +28% | 1 in 1,041 |
| 2002 | =186 | 228 | +57% | 1 in 1,272 |
| 2001 | =267 | 145 | +29% | 1 in 2,000 |
| 2000 | =310 | 112 | -10% | 1 in 2,632 |
| 1999 | =286 | 124 | +24% | 1 in 2,440 |
| 1998 | =339 | 100 | +37% | n/a |
| 1997 | =418 | 73 | -18% | 1 in 4,295 |
| 1996 | =375 | 89 | 1 in 3,550 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Lilly
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Lilly is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate