Names / Girls / England and Wales

Sarah

Sarah was given to 371 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 131st, down from 18th at its height in 1996.

371babies in 2025
#131rank, down 1 on 2024
1 in 767†girls born in 2025
-12%†since 2020 (422)

Thirty years of Sarah

SarahEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Sarah in numbers

Sarah peaked in 1996 with 3,111 girls and has fallen since, to 371 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 1996 and 1999, from 3,111 to 1,733. It ranked 18th in 1996 and ranks 131st now. On average it was given to 2,380 girls a year in the late 1990s, 1,064 in the 2000s, 582 in the 2010s and 391 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 50 from 1996, and its peak: 3,111
2025Lowest point: 371 babies, rank 131
Not yetin the top 10

Change

  • On last year-1%375 to 371
  • 5 years-12%422 to 371
  • 10 years-36%581 to 371
  • 20 years-61%962 to 371
  • Since 1996-88%3,111 to 371
  • Total, 1996 to 202528,326girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Zoe, Emma, Charlotte, Naomi, Alexandra. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales371

Rank 131 · ONS · 375 in 2024

Scotland29

Rank 149 · NRS · 29 in 2024

Northern Ireland20

Rank 106 · NISRA · 27 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Sarah year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025131371-1%1 in 767
2024=130375-4%1 in 773
2023=127392+2%1 in 735
2022131384-5%1 in 768
2021=125403-5%1 in 756
2020=115422-12%1 in 710
2019107479-5%1 in 650
2018103503-5%1 in 635
2017103530-7%1 in 625
201696572-2%1 in 593
201596581-3%1 in 585
201495601+5%1 in 563
2013 *96574-3%1 in 595
201295592-11%1 in 600
201190663-8%1 in 532
201083722-9%1 in 488
200979793-15%1 in 434
200872930+4%1 in 372
2007=70897-8%1 in 374
200658976+1%1 in 335
200556962-7%1 in 328
2004561,037-3%1 in 300
2003491,066-8%1 in 284
2002391,161-10%1 in 250
2001381,285-16%1 in 226
2000341,536-11%1 in 192
1999311,733-16%1 in 175
1998272,062-21%n/a
1997222,613-16%1 in 120
1996183,1111 in 102

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Sarah

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Sarah with any name

Share and download

Sarah is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026