Thirty years of Heidi
Heidi in numbers
Heidi has risen from 193 girls in 1996 to 376 in 2025, though it is below its peak of 752 in 2016. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2005 and 2008, from 224 to 550. It ranked 218th in 1996, reached 76th in 2016 and ranks 130th now. On average it was given to 170 girls a year in the late 1990s, 302 in the 2000s, 645 in the 2010s and 484 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-15%443 to 376
- 5 years-31%542 to 376
- 10 years-45%683 to 376
- 20 years+68%224 to 376
- Since 1996+95%193 to 376
- Total, 1996 to 202513,051girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 130 · ONS · 443 in 2024
Rank 91 · NRS · 45 in 2024
Rank 57 · NISRA · 31 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 130 | 376 | -15% | 1 in 757 |
| 2024 | =107 | 443 | -0% | 1 in 654 |
| 2023 | =107 | 445 | -8% | 1 in 647 |
| 2022 | 103 | 485 | -20% | 1 in 608 |
| 2021 | 84 | 610 | +13% | 1 in 500 |
| 2020 | 95 | 542 | -6% | 1 in 553 |
| 2019 | 93 | 577 | -7% | 1 in 539 |
| 2018 | =86 | 621 | -1% | 1 in 514 |
| 2017 | =84 | 628 | -16% | 1 in 527 |
| 2016 | 76 | 752 | +10% | 1 in 451 |
| 2015 | 80 | 683 | +3% | 1 in 497 |
| 2014 | =84 | 662 | +18% | 1 in 511 |
| 2013 * | 99 | 561 | -17% | 1 in 609 |
| 2012 | 83 | 678 | +4% | 1 in 524 |
| 2011 | 91 | 652 | +3% | 1 in 541 |
| 2010 | =93 | 633 | +4% | 1 in 556 |
| 2009 | 97 | 608 | +11% | 1 in 566 |
| 2008 | 103 | 550 | +30% | 1 in 629 |
| 2007 | 131 | 423 | +45% | 1 in 793 |
| 2006 | =182 | 291 | +30% | 1 in 1,124 |
| 2005 | 214 | 224 | -10% | 1 in 1,407 |
| 2004 | =192 | 250 | +13% | 1 in 1,245 |
| 2003 | 214 | 222 | +35% | 1 in 1,365 |
| 2002 | 244 | 164 | +24% | 1 in 1,769 |
| 2001 | 286 | 132 | -18% | 1 in 2,197 |
| 2000 | 248 | 160 | +25% | 1 in 1,843 |
| 1999 | =283 | 128 | -23% | 1 in 2,364 |
| 1998 | 245 | 166 | -14% | n/a |
| 1997 | =219 | 192 | -1% | 1 in 1,633 |
| 1996 | 218 | 193 | 1 in 1,637 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Heidi
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Heidi is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate