Names / Girls / England and Wales

Daphne

Daphne was given to 390 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking joint 125th, its highest place in thirty years.

390babies in 2025
=125joint rank, up 25 on 2024
1 in 730†girls born in 2025
+175%†since 2020 (142)

Thirty years of Daphne

DaphneEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Daphne in numbers

Daphne is still climbing: from 4 girls in 1996 to 390 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2020 and 2023, from 142 to 299. On average it was given to 8 girls a year in the late 1990s, 15 in the 2000s, 74 in the 2010s and 275 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996Lowest point: 4 babies, rank 3,126
2010First in the top 1,000
2015First in the top 500
2025Its peak: 390 babies
Not yetin the top 100

Change

  • On last year+15%338 to 390
  • 5 years+175%142 to 390
  • 10 years+348%87 to 390
  • 20 years+2,338%16 to 390
  • Since 1996×984 to 390
  • Total, 1996 to 20252,573girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Arabella, Nora, Ophelia, Ayah, Rosa. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales390

Rank 125 · ONS · 338 in 2024

Scotland24

Rank 172 · NRS · 6 in 2024

Northern Ireland3

Rank 397 · NISRA

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Daphne year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025=125390+15%1 in 730
2024150338+13%1 in 857
2023172299+12%1 in 963
2022190268+25%1 in 1,100
2021234214+51%1 in 1,424
2020=320142+23%1 in 2,109
2019=382115-2%1 in 2,707
2018=382117+26%1 in 2,731
2017=47293+12%1 in 3,560
2016=51683-5%1 in 4,087
2015=49687+40%1 in 3,905
2014=64562+19%1 in 5,459
2013 *=75052+13%1 in 6,567
2012=82546+10%1 in 7,724
2011=85842+8%1 in 8,403
2010=89639+30%1 in 9,031
2009=1,05530+58%1 in 11,470
2008=1,44719+19%1 in 18,197
2007=1,57316+14%1 in 20,969
2006=1,66014-13%1 in 23,369
2005=1,40616-20%1 in 19,701
2004=1,15820+100%1 in 15,569
2003=1,84310-17%1 in 30,303
2002=1,53012+50%1 in 24,171
2001=2,0238-11%1 in 36,248
2000=1,8319-18%1 in 32,756
1999=1,55711+0%1 in 27,510
1998=1,57111+83%n/a
1997=2,4116+50%1 in 52,252
1996=3,12641 in 78,997

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Daphne

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Daphne with any name

Share and download

Daphne is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026