Names / Girls / England and Wales

Anna

Anna was given to 347 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 142nd, down from 31st at its height in 2000.

347babies in 2025
#142rank, down 17 on 2024
1 in 820†girls born in 2025
-40%†since 2020 (574)

Thirty years of Anna

AnnaEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Anna in numbers

Anna peaked in 2000 with 1,612 girls and has fallen since, to 347 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 2000 and 2003, from 1,612 to 1,235. It ranked 47th in 1996, reached 31st in 2000 and ranks 142nd now. On average it was given to 1,381 girls a year in the late 1990s, 1,202 in the 2000s, 791 in the 2010s and 450 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 50 from 1996
2000Its peak: 1,612 babies
2025Lowest point: 347 babies, rank 142
Not yetin the top 10

Change

  • On last year-11%388 to 347
  • 5 years-40%574 to 347
  • 10 years-58%825 to 347
  • 20 years-68%1,096 to 347
  • Since 1996-73%1,274 to 347
  • Total, 1996 to 202528,146girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Molly, Chloe, Lucy, Hannah, Emily. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales347

Rank 142 · ONS · 388 in 2024

Scotland74

Rank 54 · NRS · 76 in 2024

Northern Ireland77

Rank 11 · NISRA · 65 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Anna year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025142347-11%1 in 820
2024125388-1%1 in 747
2023126393-13%1 in 733
2022114450-17%1 in 655
202197545-5%1 in 559
202089574-11%1 in 522
201982642+2%1 in 485
201885628-14%1 in 509
201775730-6%1 in 453
201673779-6%1 in 435
201570825+3%1 in 412
201470804-1%1 in 421
2013 *69812-10%1 in 421
201268902+9%1 in 394
201167827-13%1 in 427
2010=63956-2%1 in 368
200964972-5%1 in 354
2008641,028-2%1 in 336
2007581,052-7%1 in 319
2006501,130+3%1 in 290
2005521,096-7%1 in 288
2004501,173-5%1 in 265
2003391,235-4%1 in 245
2002371,292-10%1 in 224
2001341,432-11%1 in 203
2000311,612+18%1 in 183
1999391,369-1%1 in 221
1998421,389-7%n/a
1997=401,490+17%1 in 210
1996471,2741 in 248

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Anna

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Anna with any name

Share and download

Anna is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026