Names / Girls / England and Wales

Hana

Hana was given to 341 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking joint 144th, its highest place in thirty years.

341babies in 2025
=144joint rank, up 46 on 2024
1 in 835†girls born in 2025
+46%†since 2020 (233)

Thirty years of Hana

HanaEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Hana in numbers

Hana is still climbing: from 56 girls in 1996 to 341 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2022 and 2025, from 237 to 341. On average it was given to 73 girls a year in the late 1990s, 162 in the 2000s, 172 in the 2010s and 254 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 500 from 1996
2025Its peak: 341 babies
Not yetin the top 100

Change

  • On last year+34%254 to 341
  • 5 years+46%233 to 341
  • 10 years+137%144 to 341
  • 20 years+121%154 to 341
  • Since 1996×656 to 341
  • Total, 1996 to 20255,151girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Kiara, Kaia, Talia, Yusra, Alina. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales341

Rank 144 · ONS · 254 in 2024

Scotland10

Rank 324 · NRS · 3 in 2024

Northern IrelandNot in the latest list

Fewer than 3 babies, or not published · NISRA

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Hana year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025=144341+34%1 in 835
2024=190254+11%1 in 1,141
2023=209228-4%1 in 1,263
2022210237+3%1 in 1,244
2021=214231-1%1 in 1,319
2020=211233+11%1 in 1,285
2019=236210+0%1 in 1,482
2018242209+32%1 in 1,529
2017=308158-18%1 in 2,095
2016266192+33%1 in 1,767
2015=325144-6%1 in 2,359
2014=304154-2%1 in 2,198
2013 *=300157-17%1 in 2,175
2012=261190+19%1 in 1,870
2011=304160+11%1 in 2,206
2010=324144-16%1 in 2,446
2009=275172+6%1 in 2,001
2008=289163-17%1 in 2,121
2007255197+21%1 in 1,703
2006=284163+6%1 in 2,007
2005=278154-1%1 in 2,047
2004271155-12%1 in 2,009
2003248177+5%1 in 1,712
2002240168+17%1 in 1,726
2001=271143+14%1 in 2,028
2000=297125+44%1 in 2,358
1999=37087+9%1 in 3,478
199839580+16%n/a
1997=43369+23%1 in 4,544
1996=491561 in 5,643

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Hana

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Hana with any name

Share and download

Hana is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026