Thirty years of Khadija
Khadija in numbers
Khadija has climbed from 46 girls in 1996 to 340 in 2025, close to its peak of 346 in 2024. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2009 and 2012, from 194 to 273. On average it was given to 64 girls a year in the late 1990s, 148 in the 2000s, 273 in the 2010s and 303 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-2%346 to 340
- 5 years+25%273 to 340
- 10 years+16%294 to 340
- 20 years+97%173 to 340
- Since 1996×746 to 340
- Total, 1996 to 20256,288girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 146 · ONS · 346 in 2024
Rank 272 · NRS · 9 in 2024
Fewer than 3 babies, or not published · NISRA
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 146 | 340 | -2% | 1 in 837 |
| 2024 | =143 | 346 | +13% | 1 in 837 |
| 2023 | =169 | 305 | +7% | 1 in 944 |
| 2022 | 179 | 286 | +7% | 1 in 1,031 |
| 2021 | 193 | 268 | -2% | 1 in 1,137 |
| 2020 | =182 | 273 | -7% | 1 in 1,097 |
| 2019 | =171 | 295 | -8% | 1 in 1,055 |
| 2018 | =167 | 321 | +13% | 1 in 995 |
| 2017 | 188 | 283 | -7% | 1 in 1,170 |
| 2016 | =178 | 305 | +4% | 1 in 1,112 |
| 2015 | 186 | 294 | +4% | 1 in 1,155 |
| 2014 | 187 | 284 | +14% | 1 in 1,192 |
| 2013 * | =204 | 249 | -9% | 1 in 1,371 |
| 2012 | 190 | 273 | +21% | 1 in 1,302 |
| 2011 | =224 | 226 | +11% | 1 in 1,562 |
| 2010 | =244 | 204 | +5% | 1 in 1,726 |
| 2009 | =248 | 194 | -9% | 1 in 1,774 |
| 2008 | =233 | 213 | +27% | 1 in 1,623 |
| 2007 | =282 | 168 | +17% | 1 in 1,997 |
| 2006 | =311 | 143 | -17% | 1 in 2,288 |
| 2005 | =259 | 173 | +16% | 1 in 1,822 |
| 2004 | =278 | 149 | +11% | 1 in 2,090 |
| 2003 | =297 | 134 | +34% | 1 in 2,261 |
| 2002 | =348 | 100 | -5% | 1 in 2,900 |
| 2001 | =335 | 105 | +5% | 1 in 2,762 |
| 2000 | =337 | 100 | +23% | 1 in 2,948 |
| 1999 | =398 | 81 | +13% | 1 in 3,736 |
| 1998 | =425 | 72 | +24% | n/a |
| 1997 | =484 | 58 | +26% | 1 in 5,405 |
| 1996 | =539 | 46 | 1 in 6,869 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Khadija
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Khadija is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate