Names / Girls / England and Wales

Hannah

Hannah was given to 439 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 105th, down from 6th at its height in 1996.

439babies in 2025
#105rank, up 2 on 2024
1 in 648†girls born in 2025
-38%†since 2020 (708)

Thirty years of Hannah

HannahEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Hannah in numbers

Hannah peaked in 1996 with 5,916 girls and has fallen since, to 439 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 1996 and 1999, from 5,916 to 4,351. It ranked 6th in 1996 and ranks 105th now. On average it was given to 5,225 girls a year in the late 1990s, 3,235 in the 2000s, 1,163 in the 2010s and 532 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 10 from 1996, and its peak: 5,916
2025Lowest point: 439 babies, rank 105

Change

  • On last year-1%443 to 439
  • 5 years-38%708 to 439
  • 10 years-60%1,090 to 439
  • 20 years-85%2,990 to 439
  • Since 1996-93%5,916 to 439
  • Total, 1996 to 202568,074girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Emma, Anna, Charlotte, Chloe, Lydia. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales439

Rank 105 · ONS · 443 in 2024

Scotland64

Rank 64 · NRS · 63 in 2024

Northern Ireland43

Rank 42 · NISRA · 34 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Hannah year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025105439-1%1 in 648
2024=107443-14%1 in 654
202394515+3%1 in 559
202298501-15%1 in 589
202189588-17%1 in 518
202075708-10%1 in 423
201968786-7%1 in 396
201862849-15%1 in 376
201757998-3%1 in 332
2016571,033-5%1 in 328
2015551,090+3%1 in 312
2014591,061-15%1 in 319
2013 *441,243-8%1 in 275
2012421,357-7%1 in 262
2011411,462-16%1 in 241
2010311,749-11%1 in 201
2009291,956-16%1 in 176
2008192,335-14%1 in 148
2007162,701-8%1 in 124
2006152,946-1%1 in 111
2005142,990-10%1 in 105
2004123,312-7%1 in 94
2003103,546-8%1 in 85
200283,874-10%1 in 75
200184,282-3%1 in 68
200094,410+1%1 in 67
1999104,351-14%1 in 70
199875,052-9%n/a
199765,581-6%1 in 56
199665,9161 in 53

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Hannah

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Hannah with any name

Share and download

Hannah is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026