Names / Girls / England and Wales

Lydia

Lydia was given to 317 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking joint 158th, down from 50th at its height in 1998.

317babies in 2025
=158joint rank, up 16 on 2024
1 in 898†girls born in 2025
-13%†since 2020 (366)

Thirty years of Lydia

LydiaEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Lydia in numbers

Lydia peaked in 1999 with 1,084 girls and has fallen since, to 317 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 1999 and 2002, from 1,084 to 687. It ranked 61st in 1996, reached 50th in 1998 and ranks 158th now. On average it was given to 1,060 girls a year in the late 1990s, 725 in the 2000s, 524 in the 2010s and 324 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 100 from 1996
1998First in the top 50
1999Its peak: 1,084 babies
2024Lowest point: 287 babies, rank 174
Not yetin the top 10

Change

  • On last year+10%287 to 317
  • 5 years-13%366 to 317
  • 10 years-42%550 to 317
  • 20 years-51%649 to 317
  • Since 1996-69%1,009 to 317
  • Total, 1996 to 202518,670girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Georgia, Hannah, Chloe, Alexandra, Anna. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales317

Rank 158 · ONS · 287 in 2024

Scotland17

Rank 217 · NRS · 27 in 2024

Northern Ireland18

Rank 117 · NISRA · 24 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Lydia year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025=158317+10%1 in 898
2024174287-10%1 in 1,009
2023159320+8%1 in 900
2022173295-18%1 in 1,000
2021140358-2%1 in 851
2020=136366-2%1 in 818
2019133375-6%1 in 830
2018130398-15%1 in 803
2017116468-17%1 in 707
2016100563+2%1 in 603
2015103550-9%1 in 618
201494602+9%1 in 562
2013 *=100552-6%1 in 619
201296590+0%1 in 602
2011100589+7%1 in 599
2010107551-14%1 in 639
200991639-3%1 in 538
200888661-1%1 in 523
200786667+2%1 in 503
200686652+0%1 in 502
200584649-15%1 in 486
200470768+2%1 in 405
200369754+10%1 in 402
200276687-20%1 in 422
200159861-6%1 in 337
200057913-16%1 in 323
1999501,084+0%1 in 279
1998501,083+2%n/a
1997561,062+5%1 in 295
1996611,0091 in 313

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Lydia

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Lydia with any name

Share and download

Lydia is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026