Names / Girls / England and Wales

Martha

Martha was given to 302 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking joint 164th, down from 67th at its height in 2015.

302babies in 2025
=164joint rank, down 5 on 2024
1 in 943†girls born in 2025
-28%†since 2020 (422)

Thirty years of Martha

MarthaEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Martha in numbers

Martha peaked in 2015 with 868 girls and has fallen since, to 302 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 2015 and 2018, from 868 to 560. It ranked 214th in 1996, reached 67th in 2015 and ranks 164th now. On average it was given to 254 girls a year in the late 1990s, 474 in the 2000s, 722 in the 2010s and 407 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 500 from 1996
2006First in the top 100
2015Its peak: 868 babies
Not yetin the top 50

Change

  • On last year-5%317 to 302
  • 5 years-28%422 to 302
  • 10 years-65%868 to 302
  • 20 years-34%456 to 302
  • Since 1996+53%198 to 302
  • Total, 1996 to 202515,418girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Scarlett, Seren, Lola, Lilly, Eva. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales302

Rank 164 · ONS · 317 in 2024

Scotland12

Rank 284 · NRS · 16 in 2024

Northern Ireland25

Rank 84 · NISRA · 18 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Martha year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025=164302-5%1 in 943
2024159317-28%1 in 914
2023111438-4%1 in 658
2022110456-10%1 in 647
2021103505+20%1 in 603
2020=115422-24%1 in 710
201995552-1%1 in 564
201894560-22%1 in 571
201776718-5%1 in 461
201675756-13%1 in 449
201567868+8%1 in 391
201469807+7%1 in 419
2013 *73756-2%1 in 452
201277770+7%1 in 461
201183723+1%1 in 488
201085714-8%1 in 493
200981780+4%1 in 441
200881750+14%1 in 461
200787658+22%1 in 510
2006=96539+18%1 in 607
2005110456+21%1 in 691
2004136378+29%1 in 824
2003166294+7%1 in 1,031
2002=157276-7%1 in 1,051
2001154297-4%1 in 976
2000148310+23%1 in 951
1999178252-13%1 in 1,201
1998158289+4%n/a
1997164277+40%1 in 1,132
19962141981 in 1,596

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Martha

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Martha with any name

Share and download

Martha is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026