Thirty years of Amber
Amber in numbers
Amber peaked in 1998 with 1,701 girls and has fallen since, to 302 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 2016 and 2019, from 1,066 to 676. It ranked 40th in 1996, reached 31st in 1998 and ranks 164th now. On average it was given to 1,552 girls a year in the late 1990s, 1,324 in the 2000s, 1,000 in the 2010s and 462 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Similar spellings in the 2025 list†: Ambar (15). Matched by their letters, not by meaning or origin. ONS counts each spelling separately, so these are not added to Amber.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-24%399 to 302
- 5 years-52%626 to 302
- 10 years-72%1,085 to 302
- 20 years-81%1,562 to 302
- Since 1996-79%1,422 to 302
- Total, 1996 to 202532,221girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 164 · ONS · 399 in 2024
Rank 126 · NRS · 48 in 2024
Rank 132 · NISRA · 10 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | =164 | 302 | -24% | 1 in 943 |
| 2024 | 122 | 399 | -2% | 1 in 726 |
| 2023 | 122 | 407 | -8% | 1 in 708 |
| 2022 | 117 | 444 | -25% | 1 in 664 |
| 2021 | 88 | 594 | -5% | 1 in 513 |
| 2020 | 83 | 626 | -7% | 1 in 478 |
| 2019 | 79 | 676 | -10% | 1 in 460 |
| 2018 | 70 | 751 | -18% | 1 in 425 |
| 2017 | 61 | 915 | -14% | 1 in 362 |
| 2016 | 55 | 1,066 | -2% | 1 in 318 |
| 2015 | 57 | 1,085 | -0% | 1 in 313 |
| 2014 | 55 | 1,089 | +20% | 1 in 311 |
| 2013 * | 65 | 904 | -12% | 1 in 378 |
| 2012 | 60 | 1,023 | -15% | 1 in 347 |
| 2011 | 52 | 1,201 | -7% | 1 in 294 |
| 2010 | 52 | 1,290 | +11% | 1 in 273 |
| 2009 | 52 | 1,163 | -5% | 1 in 296 |
| 2008 | 49 | 1,228 | -1% | 1 in 282 |
| 2007 | 48 | 1,236 | -17% | 1 in 271 |
| 2006 | 39 | 1,494 | -4% | 1 in 219 |
| 2005 | 38 | 1,562 | +21% | 1 in 202 |
| 2004 | 42 | 1,291 | +6% | 1 in 241 |
| 2003 | 40 | 1,222 | -6% | 1 in 248 |
| 2002 | 36 | 1,296 | -4% | 1 in 224 |
| 2001 | 36 | 1,356 | -3% | 1 in 214 |
| 2000 | 37 | 1,393 | -13% | 1 in 212 |
| 1999 | 34 | 1,595 | -6% | 1 in 190 |
| 1998 | 31 | 1,701 | +14% | n/a |
| 1997 | =40 | 1,490 | +5% | 1 in 210 |
| 1996 | 40 | 1,422 | 1 in 222 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Amber
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Amber is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate