Thirty years of Aoife
Aoife in numbers
Aoife has risen from 71 girls in 1996 to 265 in 2025, though it is below its peak of 325 in 2015. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2010 and 2013, from 160 to 277. On average it was given to 90 girls a year in the late 1990s, 135 in the 2000s, 253 in the 2010s and 260 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+23%216 to 265
- 5 years-10%293 to 265
- 10 years-18%325 to 265
- 20 years+119%121 to 265
- Since 1996×471 to 265
- Total, 1996 to 20255,799girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 192 · ONS · 216 in 2024
Rank 116 · NRS · 49 in 2024
Rank 8 · NISRA · 97 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 192 | 265 | +23% | 1 in 1,074 |
| 2024 | =220 | 216 | -14% | 1 in 1,341 |
| 2023 | 198 | 251 | -5% | 1 in 1,148 |
| 2022 | =191 | 265 | -1% | 1 in 1,113 |
| 2021 | =190 | 269 | -8% | 1 in 1,133 |
| 2020 | 172 | 293 | +13% | 1 in 1,022 |
| 2019 | 189 | 259 | -10% | 1 in 1,202 |
| 2018 | 182 | 289 | +10% | 1 in 1,106 |
| 2017 | =198 | 263 | -10% | 1 in 1,259 |
| 2016 | =186 | 293 | -10% | 1 in 1,158 |
| 2015 | 167 | 325 | +27% | 1 in 1,045 |
| 2014 | 209 | 256 | -8% | 1 in 1,322 |
| 2013 * | =192 | 277 | +13% | 1 in 1,233 |
| 2012 | 205 | 246 | +48% | 1 in 1,444 |
| 2011 | =297 | 166 | +4% | 1 in 2,126 |
| 2010 | 296 | 160 | -15% | 1 in 2,201 |
| 2009 | =253 | 189 | +20% | 1 in 1,821 |
| 2008 | =298 | 157 | -15% | 1 in 2,202 |
| 2007 | =263 | 185 | +33% | 1 in 1,814 |
| 2006 | =316 | 139 | +15% | 1 in 2,354 |
| 2005 | =332 | 121 | -5% | 1 in 2,605 |
| 2004 | 317 | 127 | +19% | 1 in 2,452 |
| 2003 | =351 | 107 | +5% | 1 in 2,832 |
| 2002 | =344 | 102 | -7% | 1 in 2,844 |
| 2001 | =323 | 110 | +0% | 1 in 2,636 |
| 2000 | =313 | 110 | +7% | 1 in 2,680 |
| 1999 | =323 | 103 | +8% | 1 in 2,938 |
| 1998 | =354 | 95 | +6% | n/a |
| 1997 | =362 | 90 | +27% | 1 in 3,483 |
| 1996 | =436 | 71 | 1 in 4,451 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Aoife
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Aoife is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate