Names / Girls / England and Wales

Zahra

Zahra was given to 418 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 116th, its highest place in thirty years.

418babies in 2025
#116rank, up 10 on 2024
1 in 681†girls born in 2025
+45%†since 2020 (289)

Thirty years of Zahra

ZahraEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Zahra in numbers

Zahra is still climbing: from 106 girls in 1996 to 418 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2005 and 2008, from 278 to 396. On average it was given to 142 girls a year in the late 1990s, 278 in the 2000s, 347 in the 2010s and 340 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 500 from 1996
2025Its peak: 418 babies
Not yetin the top 100

Change

  • On last year+8%387 to 418
  • 5 years+45%289 to 418
  • 10 years+16%361 to 418
  • 20 years+50%278 to 418
  • Since 1996×4106 to 418
  • Total, 1996 to 20258,856girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Safa, Zainab, Amirah, Lucia, Fatima. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales418

Rank 116 · ONS · 387 in 2024

Scotland22

Rank 183 · NRS · 24 in 2024

Northern IrelandNot in the latest list

Fewer than 3 babies, or not published · NISRA

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Zahra year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025116418+8%1 in 681
2024126387+12%1 in 749
2023142346+4%1 in 832
2022=147333+24%1 in 885
2021=190269-7%1 in 1,133
2020174289-10%1 in 1,036
2019=156320-4%1 in 973
2018162333-3%1 in 959
2017=162345-4%1 in 960
2016=154359-1%1 in 945
2015149361+2%1 in 941
2014158353+12%1 in 959
2013 *=167314-20%1 in 1,088
2012=144393+14%1 in 904
2011154345-1%1 in 1,023
2010151348-4%1 in 1,012
2009152361-9%1 in 953
2008136396+13%1 in 873
2007155352+4%1 in 953
2006158338+22%1 in 968
2005183278+18%1 in 1,134
2004197235+5%1 in 1,325
2003=211223-2%1 in 1,359
2002=188227+23%1 in 1,278
2001219184+2%1 in 1,576
2000=226181+19%1 in 1,629
1999=260152-3%1 in 1,991
1998=254157+3%n/a
1997=256153+44%1 in 2,049
1996=3311061 in 2,981

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Zahra

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Zahra with any name

Share and download

Zahra is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026