Thirty years of Sara
Sara in numbers
Sara has held steady for thirty years: never fewer than 350 girls a year and never more than 653. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2004 and 2007, from 350 to 514. It ranked 113th in 1996, reached 82nd in 2017 and ranks 110th now. On average it was given to 378 girls a year in the late 1990s, 442 in the 2000s, 585 in the 2010s and 475 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-10%476 to 427
- 5 years-14%496 to 427
- 10 years-30%612 to 427
- 20 years-3%442 to 427
- Since 1996+6%404 to 427
- Total, 1996 to 202514,632girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 110 · ONS · 476 in 2024
Rank 204 · NRS · 25 in 2024
Rank 397 · NISRA · 12 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 110 | 427 | -10% | 1 in 667 |
| 2024 | 97 | 476 | +7% | 1 in 609 |
| 2023 | =107 | 445 | -10% | 1 in 647 |
| 2022 | =99 | 497 | -3% | 1 in 593 |
| 2021 | 100 | 511 | +3% | 1 in 596 |
| 2020 | 102 | 496 | -19% | 1 in 604 |
| 2019 | 88 | 609 | +14% | 1 in 511 |
| 2018 | 98 | 535 | -18% | 1 in 597 |
| 2017 | 82 | 653 | +8% | 1 in 507 |
| 2016 | 90 | 606 | -1% | 1 in 560 |
| 2015 | 87 | 612 | +3% | 1 in 555 |
| 2014 | 96 | 596 | +8% | 1 in 568 |
| 2013 * | =100 | 552 | -5% | 1 in 619 |
| 2012 | 99 | 584 | +11% | 1 in 608 |
| 2011 | 109 | 527 | -9% | 1 in 670 |
| 2010 | 103 | 576 | +4% | 1 in 611 |
| 2009 | 99 | 553 | +0% | 1 in 622 |
| 2008 | 102 | 553 | +8% | 1 in 625 |
| 2007 | 104 | 514 | +6% | 1 in 653 |
| 2006 | 109 | 485 | +10% | 1 in 675 |
| 2005 | 120 | 442 | +26% | 1 in 713 |
| 2004 | 148 | 350 | -5% | 1 in 890 |
| 2003 | 135 | 370 | -8% | 1 in 819 |
| 2002 | 114 | 401 | +5% | 1 in 723 |
| 2001 | 123 | 383 | +4% | 1 in 757 |
| 2000 | 127 | 368 | -2% | 1 in 801 |
| 1999 | =129 | 375 | +4% | 1 in 807 |
| 1998 | 130 | 359 | -4% | n/a |
| 1997 | 130 | 373 | -8% | 1 in 841 |
| 1996 | =113 | 404 | 1 in 782 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Sara
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Sara is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate