Thirty years of Ozzy
Ozzy in numbers
Ozzy is still climbing: from 8 boys in 2000 (its first published year) to 264 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2022 and 2025, from 99 to 264. On average it was given to 12 boys a year in the 2000s, 26 in the 2010s and 146 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+30%203 to 264
- 5 years+319%63 to 264
- 10 years+1,048%23 to 264
- 20 years+2,100%12 to 264
- Since 2000 (first published)×338 to 264
- Total, 1996 to 20251,256boys
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 191 · ONS · 203 in 2024
Rank 367 · NRS · 10 in 2024
Rank 344 · NISRA · 4 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 191 | 264 | +30% | 1 in 1,139 |
| 2024 | 243 | 203 | +26% | 1 in 1,502 |
| 2023 | =284 | 161 | +63% | 1 in 1,882 |
| 2022 | 421 | 99 | +13% | 1 in 3,137 |
| 2021 | =465 | 88 | +40% | 1 in 3,638 |
| 2020 | =576 | 63 | +31% | 1 in 4,992 |
| 2019 | =694 | 48 | -2% | 1 in 6,856 |
| 2018 | =702 | 49 | +88% | 1 in 6,889 |
| 2017 | =1,097 | 26 | +18% | 1 in 13,387 |
| 2016 * | =1,234 | 22 | -4% | 1 in 16,187 |
| 2015 | =1,159 | 23 | +10% | 1 in 15,571 |
| 2014 | =1,223 | 21 | -13% | 1 in 16,989 |
| 2013 | =1,086 | 24 | +60% | 1 in 14,932 |
| 2012 | =1,589 | 15 | -17% | 1 in 24,955 |
| 2011 | =1,342 | 18 | +6% | 1 in 20,609 |
| 2010 | =1,407 | 17 | +31% | 1 in 21,821 |
| 2009 | =1,649 | 13 | +18% | 1 in 27,856 |
| 2008 | =1,828 | 11 | -15% | 1 in 32,995 |
| 2007 | =1,578 | 13 | -28% | 1 in 27,266 |
| 2006 | =1,168 | 18 | +50% | 1 in 19,023 |
| 2005 | =1,534 | 12 | -14% | 1 in 27,548 |
| 2004 | =1,280 | 14 | +17% | 1 in 23,452 |
| 2003 | =1,326 | 12 | +20% | 1 in 26,535 |
| 2002 | =1,411 | 10 | +150% | 1 in 30,605 |
| 2001 | =2,587 | 4 | -50% | 1 in 76,154 |
| 2000 | =1,552 | 8 | 1 in 38,701 | |
| 1999 | n/a | under 3 | ||
| 1998 | n/a | under 3 | ||
| 1997 | n/a | under 3 | ||
| 1996 | n/a | under 3 |
* ONS’s boys’ 2016 file repeats the October total as September, so the 2016 births total is about 932 too low and 1 in X for 2016 is slightly too low. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Ozzy
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Ozzy is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate