Thirty years of Oakley
Oakley in numbers
Oakley has climbed from 17 boys in 1996 to 1,377 in 2025, close to its peak of 1,432 in 2024. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2020 and 2023, from 697 to 1,343. It ranked 853rd in 1996 and reached 33rd in 2025, its best place so far: fewer babies get the name than at its peak, but the names above it have fallen further. On average it was given to 22 boys a year in the late 1990s, 84 in the 2000s, 348 in the 2010s and 1,134 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
What the official statisticians said
“A potential reason for the rise in popularity of the name in 2023 is Lauren Oakley”
National Records of Scotland, on 2023 births in Scotland. Read the source
Quoted word for word from the official releases, including their own “may” and “could”. Baby Data has not added reasons of its own. Releases for Scotland and Northern Ireland are about babies there, not in England and Wales.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-4%1,432 to 1,377
- 5 years+98%697 to 1,377
- 10 years+296%348 to 1,377
- 20 years+1,520%85 to 1,377
- Since 1996×8117 to 1,377
- Total, 1996 to 202511,215boys
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 33 · ONS · 1,432 in 2024
Rank 86 · NRS · 48 in 2024
Rank 126 · NISRA · 12 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 33 | 1,377 | -4% | 1 in 218 |
| 2024 | 34 | 1,432 | +7% | 1 in 213 |
| 2023 | 39 | 1,343 | +28% | 1 in 226 |
| 2022 | 56 | 1,048 | +15% | 1 in 296 |
| 2021 | 67 | 908 | +30% | 1 in 353 |
| 2020 | 82 | 697 | +9% | 1 in 451 |
| 2019 | 98 | 639 | +28% | 1 in 515 |
| 2018 | 120 | 500 | +22% | 1 in 675 |
| 2017 | 142 | 409 | -8% | 1 in 851 |
| 2016 * | 134 | 445 | +28% | 1 in 800 |
| 2015 | =166 | 348 | +15% | 1 in 1,029 |
| 2014 | 186 | 303 | +18% | 1 in 1,177 |
| 2013 | 210 | 256 | +4% | 1 in 1,400 |
| 2012 | 217 | 247 | +12% | 1 in 1,516 |
| 2011 | =222 | 220 | +93% | 1 in 1,686 |
| 2010 | =361 | 114 | +4% | 1 in 3,254 |
| 2009 | =354 | 110 | -17% | 1 in 3,292 |
| 2008 | =306 | 132 | +7% | 1 in 2,750 |
| 2007 | =305 | 123 | +16% | 1 in 2,882 |
| 2006 | =330 | 106 | +25% | 1 in 3,230 |
| 2005 | =370 | 85 | +12% | 1 in 3,889 |
| 2004 | =376 | 76 | -4% | 1 in 4,320 |
| 2003 | =344 | 79 | +76% | 1 in 4,031 |
| 2002 | =481 | 45 | +13% | 1 in 6,801 |
| 2001 | =503 | 40 | -15% | 1 in 7,615 |
| 2000 | =445 | 47 | +42% | 1 in 6,587 |
| 1999 | =563 | 33 | +83% | 1 in 9,674 |
| 1998 | =850 | 18 | +0% | 1 in 18,105 |
| 1997 | =845 | 18 | +6% | 1 in 18,309 |
| 1996 | =853 | 17 | 1 in 19,617 |
* ONS’s boys’ 2016 file repeats the October total as September, so the 2016 births total is about 932 too low and 1 in X for 2016 is slightly too low. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Oakley
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Oakley is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate
Oakley is in our lists: Nature baby names.