Names / Boys / England and Wales

Luke

Luke was given to 380 boys in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 131st, down from 11th at its height in 1997.

380babies in 2025
#131rank, up 7 on 2024
1 in 791†boys born in 2025
-30%†since 2020 (544)

Thirty years of Luke

LukeEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Luke in numbers

Luke peaked in 1996 with 5,664 boys and has fallen since, to 380 in 2025. Its biggest three-year fall came between 2006 and 2009, from 3,475 to 2,220. It ranked 12th in 1996, reached 11th in 1997 and ranks 131st now. On average it was given to 5,182 boys a year in the late 1990s, 3,660 in the 2000s, 1,254 in the 2010s and 460 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 50 from 1996, and its peak: 5,664
2025Lowest point: 380 babies, rank 131
Not yetin the top 10

Change

  • On last year-2%387 to 380
  • 5 years-30%544 to 380
  • 10 years-65%1,095 to 380
  • 20 years-90%3,771 to 380
  • Since 1996-93%5,664 to 380
  • Total, 1996 to 202572,627boys

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Matthew, Aaron, Callum, Jamie, Connor. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales380

Rank 131 · ONS · 387 in 2024

Scotland69

Rank 70 · NRS · 89 in 2024

Northern Ireland29

Rank 83 · NISRA · 44 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Luke year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025131380-2%1 in 791
2024138387-13%1 in 788
2023118446-12%1 in 679
2022110505+2%1 in 615
2021117496-9%1 in 645
2020109544-14%1 in 578
2019100632-7%1 in 521
201894677-22%1 in 499
201776868-18%1 in 401
2016 *=591,056-4%1 in 337
2015581,095-17%1 in 327
2014441,322-7%1 in 270
2013451,415-9%1 in 253
2012451,557-15%1 in 240
2011411,830-12%1 in 203
2010382,090-6%1 in 177
2009332,220-14%1 in 163
2008252,582-17%1 in 141
2007213,125-10%1 in 113
2006173,475-8%1 in 99
2005133,771+3%1 in 88
2004163,647-8%1 in 90
2003143,958-9%1 in 80
2002134,342-6%1 in 70
2001114,610-5%1 in 66
2000114,870-2%1 in 64
1999124,982+1%1 in 64
1998134,934-4%1 in 66
1997115,147-9%1 in 64
1996125,6641 in 59

* ONS’s boys’ 2016 file repeats the October total as September, so the 2016 births total is about 932 too low and 1 in X for 2016 is slightly too low. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Luke

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Luke with any name

Share and download

Luke is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026