Names / Girls / England and Wales

Hafsa

Hafsa was given to 250 girls in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 201st, its highest place in thirty years.

250babies in 2025
#201rank, up 19 on 2024
1 in 1,139†girls born in 2025
+44%†since 2020 (174)

Thirty years of Hafsa

HafsaEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Hafsa in numbers

Hafsa is still climbing: from 72 girls in 1996 to 250 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year fall came between 2012 and 2015, from 219 to 160. On average it was given to 84 girls a year in the late 1990s, 139 in the 2000s, 192 in the 2010s and 210 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 500 from 1996
2025Its peak: 250 babies
Not yetin the top 100

Change

  • On last year+16%216 to 250
  • 5 years+44%174 to 250
  • 10 years+56%160 to 250
  • 20 years+72%145 to 250
  • Since 1996×372 to 250
  • Total, 1996 to 20254,906girls

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Isra, Hiba, Sylvie, Amira, Inayah. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales250

Rank 201 · ONS · 216 in 2024

Scotland10

Rank 324 · NRS · 6 in 2024

Northern IrelandNot in the latest list

Fewer than 3 babies, or not published · NISRA

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Hafsa year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025201250+16%1 in 1,139
2024=220216-1%1 in 1,341
2023=216219+12%1 in 1,315
2022=243195-5%1 in 1,512
2021243205+18%1 in 1,486
2020=273174-2%1 in 1,721
2019=275177+12%1 in 1,759
2018=298158-11%1 in 2,022
2017=274178-3%1 in 1,860
2016=271184+15%1 in 1,844
2015=298160-23%1 in 2,123
2014=235209-2%1 in 1,619
2013 *=236213-3%1 in 1,603
2012=231219+5%1 in 1,622
2011=239208-4%1 in 1,697
2010231216+17%1 in 1,631
2009=258185+3%1 in 1,860
2008269179+10%1 in 1,932
2007=289163+3%1 in 2,058
2006=288159+10%1 in 2,058
2005=289145-1%1 in 2,174
2004=284147+25%1 in 2,118
2003=322118+9%1 in 2,568
2002=333108+5%1 in 2,686
2001=340103+27%1 in 2,815
2000=39381-27%1 in 3,640
1999=307111+37%1 in 2,726
1998=39181+11%n/a
1997=41873+1%1 in 4,295
1996=432721 in 4,389

* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Hafsa

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Hafsa with any name

Share and download

Hafsa is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026