Thirty years of Erin
Erin in numbers
Erin peaked in 2006 with 1,985 girls and has fallen since, to 633 in 2025. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2003 and 2006, from 1,361 to 1,985. It ranked 100th in 1996, reached 27th in 2007 and ranks 72nd now. On average it was given to 623 girls a year in the late 1990s, 1,549 in the 2000s, 1,288 in the 2010s and 764 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Similar spellings in the 2025 list†: Eryn (29), Eirinn (7), Erinn (3). Matched by their letters, not by meaning or origin. ONS counts each spelling separately, so these are not added to Erin.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-8%689 to 633
- 5 years-26%851 to 633
- 10 years-49%1,249 to 633
- 20 years-65%1,788 to 633
- Since 1996+30%486 to 633
- Total, 1996 to 202535,446girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 72 · ONS · 689 in 2024
Rank 126 · NRS · 56 in 2024
Rank 21 · NISRA · 58 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 72 | 633 | -8% | 1 in 450 |
| 2024 | 65 | 689 | -1% | 1 in 420 |
| 2023 | =65 | 698 | -16% | 1 in 413 |
| 2022 | 55 | 829 | -6% | 1 in 356 |
| 2021 | 59 | 884 | +4% | 1 in 345 |
| 2020 | 58 | 851 | -10% | 1 in 352 |
| 2019 | 54 | 947 | -8% | 1 in 329 |
| 2018 | 50 | 1,024 | -12% | 1 in 312 |
| 2017 | 45 | 1,161 | -4% | 1 in 285 |
| 2016 | 46 | 1,212 | -3% | 1 in 280 |
| 2015 | 43 | 1,249 | -7% | 1 in 272 |
| 2014 | 42 | 1,343 | +1% | 1 in 252 |
| 2013 * | 40 | 1,328 | -12% | 1 in 257 |
| 2012 | 36 | 1,504 | +1% | 1 in 236 |
| 2011 | 39 | 1,491 | -8% | 1 in 237 |
| 2010 | 35 | 1,621 | -5% | 1 in 217 |
| 2009 | 33 | 1,705 | -6% | 1 in 202 |
| 2008 | 30 | 1,818 | -4% | 1 in 190 |
| 2007 | 27 | 1,888 | -5% | 1 in 178 |
| 2006 | 28 | 1,985 | +11% | 1 in 165 |
| 2005 | 32 | 1,788 | +21% | 1 in 176 |
| 2004 | 36 | 1,481 | +9% | 1 in 210 |
| 2003 | 36 | 1,361 | +6% | 1 in 223 |
| 2002 | 38 | 1,278 | +8% | 1 in 227 |
| 2001 | 42 | 1,188 | +19% | 1 in 244 |
| 2000 | 52 | 997 | +25% | 1 in 296 |
| 1999 | =68 | 796 | +17% | 1 in 380 |
| 1998 | 79 | 679 | +28% | n/a |
| 1997 | 97 | 532 | +9% | 1 in 589 |
| 1996 | 100 | 486 | 1 in 650 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Erin
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Erin is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate
Erin is in our lists: Short baby names.