Thirty years of Eesa
Eesa in numbers
Eesa is still climbing: from 3 boys in 1997 (its first published year) to 330 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2011 and 2014, from 137 to 234. On average it was given to 58 boys a year in the 2000s, 238 in the 2010s and 294 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+14%290 to 330
- 5 years+17%283 to 330
- 10 years+31%251 to 330
- 20 years+441%61 to 330
- Since 1997 (first published)×1103 to 330
- Total, 1996 to 20254,735boys
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 159 · ONS · 290 in 2024
Rank 269 · NRS · 16 in 2024
Fewer than 3 babies, or not published · NISRA
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 159 | 330 | +14% | 1 in 911 |
| 2024 | =175 | 290 | +8% | 1 in 1,052 |
| 2023 | =189 | 268 | -11% | 1 in 1,131 |
| 2022 | 170 | 301 | +3% | 1 in 1,032 |
| 2021 | =180 | 293 | +4% | 1 in 1,093 |
| 2020 | 186 | 283 | -1% | 1 in 1,111 |
| 2019 | =183 | 285 | -1% | 1 in 1,155 |
| 2018 | 182 | 289 | -12% | 1 in 1,168 |
| 2017 | 167 | 328 | +9% | 1 in 1,061 |
| 2016 * | =186 | 300 | +20% | 1 in 1,187 |
| 2015 | =226 | 251 | +7% | 1 in 1,427 |
| 2014 | =235 | 234 | +9% | 1 in 1,525 |
| 2013 | 238 | 214 | +13% | 1 in 1,675 |
| 2012 | =254 | 190 | +39% | 1 in 1,970 |
| 2011 | =323 | 137 | -7% | 1 in 2,708 |
| 2010 | =303 | 147 | +11% | 1 in 2,523 |
| 2009 | =309 | 133 | +39% | 1 in 2,723 |
| 2008 | =390 | 96 | +3% | 1 in 3,781 |
| 2007 | =386 | 93 | +31% | 1 in 3,811 |
| 2006 | =453 | 71 | +16% | 1 in 4,823 |
| 2005 | =461 | 61 | +52% | 1 in 5,419 |
| 2004 | =599 | 40 | +21% | 1 in 8,208 |
| 2003 | =653 | 33 | +65% | 1 in 9,649 |
| 2002 | =869 | 20 | +18% | 1 in 15,302 |
| 2001 | =947 | 17 | +21% | 1 in 17,918 |
| 2000 | =1,048 | 14 | +40% | 1 in 22,115 |
| 1999 | =1,281 | 10 | +150% | 1 in 31,924 |
| 1998 | =2,419 | 4 | +33% | 1 in 81,474 |
| 1997 | =2,859 | 3 | 1 in 109,855 | |
| 1996 | n/a | under 3 |
* ONS’s boys’ 2016 file repeats the October total as September, so the 2016 births total is about 932 too low and 1 in X for 2016 is slightly too low. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Eesa
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Eesa is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate