Names / Boys / England and Wales

Cooper

Cooper was given to 493 boys in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 105th, its highest place since it first appeared in 1997.

493babies in 2025
#105rank, up 34 on 2024
1 in 610†boys born in 2025
+45%†since 2020 (340)

Thirty years of Cooper

CooperDotted where fewer than 3 babies were registered, so ONS did not publish a figure

Cooper in numbers

Cooper is still climbing: from 5 boys in 1997 (its first published year) to 493 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2010 and 2013, from 112 to 281.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1997Lowest point: 5 babies, rank 2,022
2002First in the top 1,000
2008First in the top 500
2025Its peak: 493 babies
Not yetin the top 100

Change

  • On last year+28%384 to 493
  • 5 years+45%340 to 493
  • 10 years+28%385 to 493
  • 20 years+1,197%38 to 493
  • Since 1997 (first published)×995 to 493
  • Total, 1996 to 20255,825boys

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Reggie, Frankie, Leonardo, Musa, Elijah. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales493

Rank 105 · ONS · 384 in 2024

Scotland65

Rank 79 · NRS · 40 in 2024

Northern Ireland17

Rank 138 · NISRA · 17 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Cooper year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025105493+28%1 in 610
2024=139384+3%1 in 794
2023142372+4%1 in 815
2022151357-9%1 in 870
2021145393+16%1 in 815
2020156340-19%1 in 925
2019134421+1%1 in 782
2018=136417+11%1 in 810
2017154374-4%1 in 931
2016 *=147390+1%1 in 913
2015147385+42%1 in 930
2014210271-4%1 in 1,316
2013=198281+9%1 in 1,275
2012=211258+64%1 in 1,451
2011=284157+40%1 in 2,363
2010=364112+13%1 in 3,312
2009=39699+16%1 in 3,658
2008=43085+35%1 in 4,270
2007=50963+57%1 in 5,626
2006=67740+5%1 in 8,560
2005=67838+23%1 in 8,699
2004=73131+138%1 in 10,591
2003=1,24813-32%1 in 24,493
2002=907191 in 16,108
2001n/aunder 3
2000=1,4259+50%1 in 34,401
1999=1,8506-50%1 in 53,207
1998=1,11012+140%1 in 27,158
1997=2,02251 in 65,913
1996n/aunder 3

* ONS’s boys’ 2016 file repeats the October total as September, so the 2016 births total is about 932 too low and 1 in X for 2016 is slightly too low. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Cooper

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Cooper with any name

Share and download

Cooper is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026