Names / Boys / England and Wales

Blake

Blake was given to 367 boys in England and Wales in 2025, ranking 144th, down from 56th at its height in 2013.

Also given to 65 girls in 2025. See the girls’ figures

367babies in 2025
#144rank, down 40 on 2024
1 in 819†boys born in 2025
-37%†since 2020 (583)

Thirty years of Blake

BlakeEvery year 1996 to 2025 published (3 or more babies)

Blake in numbers

Blake peaked in 2014 with 1,106 boys and has fallen since, to 367 in 2025. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2010 and 2013, from 618 to 1,083. It ranked 207th in 1996, reached 56th in 2013 and ranks 144th now. On average it was given to 163 boys a year in the late 1990s, 392 in the 2000s, 878 in the 2010s and 559 in the 2020s so far.

† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.

Milestones

First year in each band
1996In the top 500 from 1996
1997Lowest point: 147 babies, rank 220
2008First in the top 100
2014Its peak: 1,106 babies
Not yetin the top 50

Change

  • On last year-28%507 to 367
  • 5 years-37%583 to 367
  • 10 years-64%1,024 to 367
  • 20 years+2%361 to 367
  • Since 1996×2154 to 367
  • Total, 1996 to 202516,704boys

† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.

Names around it

Similar thirty-year curve†: Isaac, Stanley, Mason, Oscar, Ollie. Similar popularity shape, not similar sound or meaning.

Across the three nations, 2025

Each from its own statistics office, never added together
England and Wales367

Rank 144 · ONS · 507 in 2024

Scotland100

Rank 41 · NRS · 102 in 2024

Northern Ireland22

Rank 107 · NISRA · 15 in 2024

England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.

Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
Blake year by year
YearRankBabiesChange†1 in X†
2025144367-28%1 in 819
2024=104507-0%1 in 602
2023104509-18%1 in 595
202289619-20%1 in 502
202174771+32%1 in 415
2020102583-10%1 in 539
201996646-12%1 in 509
201884733-8%1 in 461
201784799-11%1 in 436
2016 *73893-13%1 in 399
2015621,024-7%1 in 350
2014571,106+2%1 in 323
2013561,083+4%1 in 331
2012=661,046+26%1 in 358
201179831+34%1 in 446
2010105618-1%1 in 600
2009101623-17%1 in 581
2008=91749+30%1 in 485
2007104577+45%1 in 614
2006134399+11%1 in 858
2005141361+12%1 in 916
2004146322+23%1 in 1,020
2003=160261+21%1 in 1,220
2002=174215+19%1 in 1,423
2001=187181-21%1 in 1,683
2000=160229+24%1 in 1,352
1999182184+10%1 in 1,735
1998=196167+14%1 in 1,951
1997220147-5%1 in 2,242
19962071541 in 2,165

* ONS’s boys’ 2016 file repeats the October total as September, so the 2016 births total is about 932 too low and 1 in X for 2016 is slightly too low. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.

Compare Blake

with

Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.

Compare Blake with any name

Share and download

Blake is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.

Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate

OM

Oliver Mackman

Editor, BabyData

Oliver Mackman is the named editor of BabyData and a director of Best Business Loans Ltd (Companies House 16833937), the company that operates the site. He is accountable for its editorial standards, sourcing and corrections, and requires every number to cite the underlying rule and the official UK dataset behind it, with pregnancy tools reviewed against NHS and gov.uk guidance before publication.

Last reviewed: 12 October 2026