Thirty years of Anaya
Anaya in numbers
Anaya is still climbing: from 4 girls in 1996 to 535 in 2025, its highest count so far. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2011 and 2014, from 195 to 412. It ranked 3,126th in 1996 and reached 86th in 2025, its best place so far. On average it was given to 51 girls a year in the 2000s, 344 in the 2010s and 431 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year+24%431 to 535
- 5 years+39%384 to 535
- 10 years+18%452 to 535
- 20 years+891%54 to 535
- Since 1996×1344 to 535
- Total, 1996 to 20256,554girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 86 · ONS · 431 in 2024
Rank 198 · NRS · 13 in 2024
Fewer than 3 babies, or not published · NISRA
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 86 | 535 | +24% | 1 in 532 |
| 2024 | =110 | 431 | +3% | 1 in 672 |
| 2023 | =117 | 419 | -0% | 1 in 687 |
| 2022 | 122 | 421 | +6% | 1 in 700 |
| 2021 | 131 | 396 | +3% | 1 in 769 |
| 2020 | =130 | 384 | +12% | 1 in 780 |
| 2019 | 147 | 344 | -3% | 1 in 905 |
| 2018 | 147 | 356 | -17% | 1 in 897 |
| 2017 | 130 | 429 | -11% | 1 in 772 |
| 2016 | =118 | 484 | +7% | 1 in 701 |
| 2015 | 127 | 452 | +10% | 1 in 752 |
| 2014 | =132 | 412 | +25% | 1 in 821 |
| 2013 * | =155 | 330 | +16% | 1 in 1,035 |
| 2012 | =179 | 284 | +46% | 1 in 1,251 |
| 2011 | 252 | 195 | +26% | 1 in 1,810 |
| 2010 | =305 | 155 | +34% | 1 in 2,272 |
| 2009 | =370 | 116 | +8% | 1 in 2,966 |
| 2008 | =404 | 107 | +53% | 1 in 3,231 |
| 2007 | =527 | 70 | +13% | 1 in 4,793 |
| 2006 | =564 | 62 | +15% | 1 in 5,277 |
| 2005 | =596 | 54 | +80% | 1 in 5,837 |
| 2004 | =883 | 30 | +3% | 1 in 10,379 |
| 2003 | =876 | 29 | +38% | 1 in 10,449 |
| 2002 | =1,032 | 21 | +91% | 1 in 13,812 |
| 2001 | =1,617 | 11 | -21% | 1 in 26,362 |
| 2000 | =1,313 | 14 | +180% | 1 in 21,058 |
| 1999 | =2,770 | 5 | +25% | 1 in 60,521 |
| 1998 | =3,142 | 4 | n/a | |
| 1997 | n/a | under 3 | ||
| 1996 | =3,126 | 4 | 1 in 78,997 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Anaya
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Anaya is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate