Thirty years of Amelia
Amelia in numbers
Amelia peaked in 2012 with 7,061 girls and has fallen since, to 2,153 in 2025. Its biggest three-year rise came between 2009 and 2012, from 3,625 to 7,061. It ranked 63rd in 1996, reached 1st in 2011 and ranks 3rd now. On average it was given to 1,209 girls a year in the late 1990s, 2,632 in the 2000s, 4,919 in the 2010s and 2,772 in the 2020s so far.
† Shapes, averages and turning points are Baby Data calculations from the ONS counts.
Milestones
First year in each bandChange
- On last year-12%2,448 to 2,153
- 5 years-35%3,319 to 2,153
- 10 years-58%5,158 to 2,153
- 20 years-28%2,976 to 2,153
- Since 1996×2929 to 2,153
- Total, 1996 to 202596,967girls
† All changes and totals are Baby Data calculations from ONS counts. A total adds only the published years.
Across the three nations, 2025
Each from its own statistics office, never added togetherRank 3 · ONS · 2,448 in 2024
Rank 4 · NRS · 198 in 2024
Rank 18 · NISRA · 74 in 2024
England and Wales (ONS) count births in the calendar year; Scotland (NRS) and Northern Ireland (NISRA) count births registered in the year. Each comes from its own statistics office and they are never added together.
Year by year, 1996 to 2025 Show all 30 yearsHide the table
| Year | Rank | Babies | Change† | 1 in X† |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3 | 2,153 | -12% | 1 in 132 |
| 2024 | 2 | 2,448 | -8% | 1 in 118 |
| 2023 | 2 | 2,663 | -8% | 1 in 108 |
| 2022 | 2 | 2,884 | -9% | 1 in 102 |
| 2021 | 2 | 3,164 | -5% | 1 in 96 |
| 2020 | 2 | 3,319 | -11% | 1 in 90 |
| 2019 | 2 | 3,712 | -6% | 1 in 84 |
| 2018 | 2 | 3,941 | -10% | 1 in 81 |
| 2017 | 2 | 4,358 | -9% | 1 in 76 |
| 2016 | 2 | 4,777 | -7% | 1 in 71 |
| 2015 | 1 | 5,158 | -3% | 1 in 66 |
| 2014 | 1 | 5,327 | -4% | 1 in 64 |
| 2013 * | 1 | 5,570 | -21% | 1 in 61 |
| 2012 * | 1 | 7,061 | +40% | 1 in 50 |
| 2011 * | 1 | 5,054 | +20% | 1 in 70 |
| 2010 | 5 | 4,227 | +17% | 1 in 83 |
| 2009 | 9 | 3,625 | +5% | 1 in 95 |
| 2008 | 9 | 3,440 | +6% | 1 in 101 |
| 2007 | 10 | 3,250 | +12% | 1 in 103 |
| 2006 | 16 | 2,907 | -2% | 1 in 113 |
| 2005 | 15 | 2,976 | +12% | 1 in 106 |
| 2004 | 18 | 2,649 | +15% | 1 in 118 |
| 2003 | 21 | 2,299 | +17% | 1 in 132 |
| 2002 | 25 | 1,973 | +15% | 1 in 147 |
| 2001 | 32 | 1,709 | +15% | 1 in 170 |
| 2000 | 35 | 1,489 | -1% | 1 in 198 |
| 1999 | 37 | 1,511 | +21% | 1 in 200 |
| 1998 | 48 | 1,249 | +9% | n/a |
| 1997 | 49 | 1,145 | +23% | 1 in 274 |
| 1996 | =63 | 929 | 1 in 340 |
* ONS’s girls’ 2013 file repeats the May total as April, so the 2013 births total is about 1,360 too high and 1 in X for 2013 is slightly too high. ONS’s own figures for the most popular girls’ names jump in 2012 for a reason we have not been able to establish, so read changes for 2011 to 2013 with care. 1 in X is not shown for girls in 1998: one monthly total is missing from the ONS girls’ 1998 file. Rank follows ONS: names with the same count share a rank (shown with =). “Under 3” means the name was given to fewer than 3 babies that year, so ONS did not publish it.
Compare Amelia
Draws the second name on the chart above, on a shared scale.
Share and download
Amelia is in the free dataset (CSV and JSON), with the method and how to cite it.
Source: Office for National Statistics, Baby names in England and Wales, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0; National Records of Scotland; NISRA. Exact spellings are counted separately and names given to fewer than 3 babies are not published. Figures marked † are Baby Data calculations. How we calculate